Hanuman plays an
important role in the Ramayan, yet in the epic itself, he does
not hold any great position. He is just one of the many
monkeys Ram encounters in the forest. He is not Sugriva,
leader of the monkey troop. He is not Angad, who is told to
lead the band of monkeys searching for Sita. He is not
Jambavan, the bear or Nila, the monkey, who are given the
responsibility of building the bridge. He is projected as an
obedient follower who, through his intelligence, strength and
courage, wins the admiration of Ram and emerges as one of the
most revered characters of the tale and a god in his own
right. But at no point does Hanuman make any attempt to steal
anyone’s glory; while in his own temple he stands powerful
with mountain in hand and feet on a demon, in Ram’s temple he
is most content sitting at the feet of his master, hands in
supplication.
Who would not
want a Hanuman in his team? One who is very good at his work,
one who will do whatever he is told to do, one who will never
seek either reward or recognition and one who finds validation
in obeying his master.
If we go to
Raju’s auto repair shop, we will find that all the work is
done by his Hanuman: Amol, a young boy, who has been working
with Raju for three years. Amol is a natural, able to fix the
most complex of problems. Raju knows he can totally rely on
Amol. No job is too big or too small for Amol. He is as happy
changing a tyre, as he is fixing the brakes. He does not boss
over the juniors and does not feel slighted if the seniors ask
him to fetch tea. If there is a problem that eludes a standard
solution, everyone knows that leave it to Amol – he will, like
Hanuman crossing the sea, find a way.
Yes, it matters
greatly to have a Hanuman in our team. One who will not
question you. One who will do exactly what you tell him to do.
One who delivers no matter what the odds. One who is loyal and
devoted. But is that really good?
The following is
a folk story of Hanuman: Hanuman once narrated the entire
Ramayan to his mother, Anjani. After the narration, an
impressed Anjani sought a clarification. “You are so strong
that with a flick of a tail you could have destroyed the whole
of Lanka, killed Ravan and rescued Sita. Why did you not do
so? So much effort and time would have been saved – you would
not have had to build a bridge to Lanka, you could have
avoided the war. Why did you not do that?”
Hanuman replied,
“Because Ram never asked me to.”
And suddenly we
wonder if this was opportunity lost. Hanuman was asked to
discover Sita’s location; he did that. Hanuman was asked to
fetch the mountain of herbs that would save Lakshmana’s life;
he did that. No one asked him to destroy the Rakshasas and
rescue Sita. So he did not do that. One common explanation
given for why Ram never asked Hanuman to kill Ravan and rescue
Sita is that it was Ram’s duty to rescue Sita, not Hanuman’s.
Ramayan is about Ram, not Hanuman. But it is not so in the
corporate world; the story is about the entire organization,
not just about the leaders.
In the entire
epic, Hanuman proves his capability time and time again. On
his way to find Sita, he displays his extraordinary power
(crosses the ocean), brain (outwits the snake-demon Surasa),
brawn (kills Simhika) and integrity (not resting on Mandara
mountain). And yet, while everyone admires this, no one seems
eager to take full advantage of it. Was this refusal to take
advantage of Hanuman’s abilities a divine decision or merely a
oversight? Is the same being done in the corporate world?
Yes, Raju loves
Amol’s work. Yes, Raju admires Amol’s work. But is Raju
harnessing the full potential of Amol? Is his contentment with
Amol’s obedience preventing him from seeing all that Amol can
do, proactively, creatively, independently, if he is given the
freedom to do so? Ask Raju and he will say, “But I don’t stop
Amol from doing anything.” He does not stop Amol from doing
anything, but he does not encourage Amol to do something else
either.
The greatest
danger of having Hanumans in our team is that his actions are
limited by our directions. Maybe we fear that if Hanuman
thinks for himself, there will be chaos – he is a monkey after
all. Maybe we fear that he will overshadow us. Hence,
ultimately, only we decide the goals, we define the vision, we
declare the mission and state the objective. Our Hanuman will
help you realize all this. But, maybe, the goals could have
been greater and grander, if we had let Hanuman do more than
merely obey.
Amol once had
given Raju a suggestion. “Sir, if we park our cars
perpendicular to the wall rather than parallel we can keep
more cars in the garage?” Raju ignored this suggestion. “Do
you work,” he snapped at Amol without giving his words much
thought. But the message he implicitly gave Amol was that – ‘I
only want your obedience, not your intelligence.’ Amol
immediately complied. And that marked the end of Amol’s
creativity that would have perhaps made Raju’s auto repair
shop a much greater success.
This is the
danger of over compliance and extreme obedience. We prevent
followers from thinking and contributing. It makes business
sense therefore to take a closer look at the Hanumans in our
team; we just might find in their hearts a Ram waiting to be
coaxed out.